United States ex rel. Matranga v. Curran

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that our review is limited to those issues raised in an appellant’s opening brief which are supported by argument
• holding, in a § 1983 case, that city policy that authorized officers to detain people for nonarrestable offenses violated state law and therefore violated the Fourth Amendment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).