United States Ex Rel. Longhi v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendants violated the FCA under a theory of fraudulent inducement where the defendants submitted false documents in SBIR proposals
• finding liability for fraudulently induced grant even though defendant produced satisfactory product, and awarding as damages the full amount paid
• finding liability for fraudulently induced grant even though defendant produced satisfactory product, and awarding as damages the full amount paid
• finding liability for fraudulently induced grant even though defendant produced satisfactory product, and awarding as damages the full amount paid
• refusing to uphold a release after concluding that allegations were insufficiently disclosed to the government prior to the release
• adopting the requirements of United States ex rel. Wilson v. Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., 525 F.3d 370, 376 (4th Cir.2008)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).