United States Ex Rel. Long v. GSDMIdea City, L.L.C.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the Fifth Circuit has “never held that the ‘limited resources’ of the losing party provide a basis for denying the prevailing party its costs”
• holding paper transcripts and video depositions are individually taxable costs under § 1920(2)
• noting that the Fifth Circuit has “never held that the ‘limited resources’ of the losing party provide a basis for denying the prevailing party its costs” (citing Moore v. CITGO Refin. & Chems. Co., 735 F.3d 309, 320 (5th Cir. 2013))
• denying costs for “shipping, binding, and tabbing of depositions” as non-taxable under § 1920 because “these types of costs are nowhere enumerated in the statute”
• declining to award expedition fees when prevailing party could have requested an extension on a motion deadline or where the timing was not particularly crucial
• finding abuse of discretion where district court awarded costs for expedited transcripts; shipping, tabbing, and binding costs; and PACER fees

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).