Skip to main content
· 8/4/2010

United States Ex Rel. Lemmon v. Envirocare of Utah, Inc.

Citations

  • 614 F.3d 1163
  • 40 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20203
  • 31 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 38
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 16117
  • 2010 WL 3025021

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the qui tarn plaintiff successfully stated an FCA claim by alleging regulatory violations that “also constituted material breaches of ... contractual obligations”
  • reversing the lower court’s dismissal af- ter walking through how the plaintiffs satisfied their Rule 9(b) burden
  • recognizing implied-certification theories linked to regulatory conditions of payment
  • reversing the district court’s dismissal where the plaintiffs alleged, inter alia, that the defendant knew about the false claims because the plaintiffs in- formed them of that fact

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kelly, O'Brien, Holmes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.