Skip to main content
· 7/31/1970

United States ex rel. Lehman v. Laird

Citations

  • 430 F.2d 96

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that reissue is a proper mechanism for perfecting priority where patentee failed to notify PTO of earlier-filed copending applications during prosecution of original application
  • concluding that reissue is a proper mechanism for perfecting priority where patentee failed to notify PTO of earlier-filed copending applications during prosecution of original application
  • permitting an applicant to perfect a priority claim under 35 U.S.C. § 120
  • permitting an applicant to perfect a priority claim under 35 U.S.C. § 120
  • foreign application disclosing one embodiment of the invention that meets the count as broadly construed, and that meets the requirements of 35 U.S.C. § 112, is sufficient to establish constructive reduction to' practice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boreman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.