· 11/6/1968
United States ex rel. Lawson v. Hendrick
Citations
- 293 F. Supp. 1403
- 1968 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8176
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding attorney-client privilege and work-product protection waived for documents plaintiff used to refresh his recollection at his deposition
- discussing “the unfair disadvantage which could be placed upon the cross-examiner by the simple expedient of using only privileged writings to refresh recollection”
- expert originally designated as testifying witness on issue cannot be deposed on issue once plaintiff decides that expert will not testify on that issue
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lord
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.