Skip to main content
· 11/6/1968

United States ex rel. Lawson v. Hendrick

Citations

  • 293 F. Supp. 1403
  • 1968 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8176

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding attorney-client privilege and work-product protection waived for documents plaintiff used to refresh his recollection at his deposition
  • discussing “the unfair disadvantage which could be placed upon the cross-examiner by the simple expedient of using only privileged writings to refresh recollection”
  • expert originally designated as testifying witness on issue cannot be deposed on issue once plaintiff decides that expert will not testify on that issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lord

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.