United States ex rel. Lawrence v. Woods

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a step-grandfather was a caretaker after the child lived with him temporarily for eight months
• holding that a step-grandfather had no standing to appeal even though his name was listed on the petition seeking to adjudicate the child neglected where the step-grandfather was not a caregiver, custodian, or parent of the child
• noting several factors, including: (1) that the child’s parents were involved and were attempting to remain involved in the child’s life, and (2) that placement with the respondent step-grandfather had lasted for eight months
• noting several factors, including: (1) that the child’s parents were involved and were attempting to remain involved in the child’s life, and (2) that placement with the respondent step-grandfather had lasted for eight months
• “[S]uch placement does not warrant the conclusion that respondent was standing in loco parentis to the children.”
• “[S]uch placement does not warrant the conclusion that respondent was standing in loco parentis to the children.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).