United States Ex Rel. Law v. Spurlock

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting “mere conclusory allegation that more time is needed to investigate the matter, and that discovery may be necessary to see if there is a basis for relator’s claims, does not justify an extension” (emphasis deleted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).