Skip to main content
· 2/10/1966

United States ex rel. Lamborn v. Rundle

Citations

  • 251 F. Supp. 766
  • 1966 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7897

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The most important consideration is the strength of the case for plaintiffs on the merits, balanced against the amount offered in settlement”
  • “the parties have provided nothing but generalities about the relative strengths and weaknesses of the class’s claims and Cargill’s potential defenses.... But they offer no specifics”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dusen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.