United States ex rel. Kripplebauer v. Turley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying amendment where moving party “should 8 || have at least alerted [opposing party and] the Court” much earlier
• “[A] diligent party would certainly have raised the issue during” the case management 3 | conferences or when the discovery impasse became apparent.
• attempted substitution after Daubert motions and summary judgment were ruled on
• construing the identical federal rule

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).