United States Ex Rel. Kosenske v. Carlisle HMA, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that falsely certifying compliance with the AKS is a sufficient predicate for a claim under the FCA
• “Falsely certifying compliance with the Stark or Anti-Kickback Acts in connection with a claim submitted to a federally funded insurance program is actionable under the FCA.”
• \Falsely certifying compliance with the [AKS] in connection with a claim submitted to a federally funded insurance program is actionable under the FCA.\
• “Falsely certifying compliance with the Stark or Anti-Kickback Acts in connection with a claim submitted to a federally funded insurance program is actionable under the FCA.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).