United States ex rel. Johnson v. Illinois

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding diversity jurisdiction was not established where plaintiff affirmatively limited his potential recovery to $74,000
• failing to consider the amendments to Rule 47 and holding that statement in state court petition ‘‘[a]ffirma-tively limiting” potential recovery coupled with post-removal stipulation that clarified ambiguities was sufficient to bind the plaintiff

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).