Skip to main content
· 12/2/2014

United States ex rel. John Doe v. Staples, Inc.

Citations

  • 413 U.S. App. D.C. 208
  • 773 F.3d 83
  • 36 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1068
  • 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 22607
  • 2014 WL 6765033

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “our inquiry focuses not on the additional incriminating information a relator supplies, but instead on whether the quantum of information already in the public sphere was sufficient to set government investigators on the trail of fraud.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tatel, Brown, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.