· 12/2/2014
United States ex rel. John Doe v. Staples, Inc.
Citations
- 413 U.S. App. D.C. 208
- 773 F.3d 83
- 36 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1068
- 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 22607
- 2014 WL 6765033
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “our inquiry focuses not on the additional incriminating information a relator supplies, but instead on whether the quantum of information already in the public sphere was sufficient to set government investigators on the trail of fraud.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tatel, Brown, Williams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.