Skip to main content
· 3/23/2000

United States Ex Rel. Jane Doe 1 v. X, Inc.

Citations

  • 246 B.R. 817
  • 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3774
  • 2000 WL 305742

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting pecuniary interest test in favor of pecuniary advantage test, relying on Commonwealth Companies
  • “. . . laws, such as the False Claims Act, that are designed to prevent or stop fraud, or to fix damages for fraud already committed, are police or regulatory laws.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ellis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.