United States ex rel. Hooper v. Ryan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that enforcing forum-selection clause would be unreasonable because it would require litigation in multiple fora and require multiple courts to adjudicate claims covering only portions of each transaction
• rejecting argument that district court could exercise jurisdiction over Venezuelan citizen and his British Virgin Island alter ego companies only through international conventions
• denying dismissal of receivership case on the basis of forum non conveniens
• “As a practical matter, [defendants’] numerous filings, appearances, and arguments before the court are sufficient to give this court jurisdiction over them.”
• defendants’ statement that they are amenable to suit in Venezuela was sufficient

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).