United States Ex Rel. Hobbs v. MedQuest Associates, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the only “express certification” on the defendant’s CMS Form 1500 was “that the services listed on the form were ‘medically indicated and necessary for the health of the patient’” but that the medical necessity of the tests at issue there had never been contested
• \The[CMS-1500] form[ ] reflect[s] the treatment or services provided and identif[ies] the [entity that] provided them.\
• “The[ CMS-1500] form[] reflect[s] the treatment or services provided and identif[ies] the [entity that] provided them.”
• “The CMS-1500 form requires the provider to ‘certify that the services listed . . . were medically indicated and necessary to the health of [the] patient and were personally furnished by [the physician] or [the physician’s] employee under [the physician’s] personal direction.’”
• delineating conditions of participation from conditions of payment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).