Skip to main content
· 9/15/1874

United States ex rel. Hill v. Towns

Citations

  • 28 F. Cas. 201
  • 7 Ben. 444

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • dismissing without prejudice plaintiffs UCL, FAL, CLRA, and fraud claims under the doctrine of primary jurisdiction
  • “[I]ssues of beverage labeling have been entrusted by Congress to the FDA, pursuant to the FDCA (and its related regulations).... ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Blatchford

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.