United States ex rel. Hill v. Myers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that litigation must be “the motivating force behind the preparation of” the document
• rejecting art broker’s assertion that she acted as an agent of purchaser of painting for purposes of privilege, where the facts indicated she acted “as a broker who worked for both parties to facilitate the sale” and whose role was “that of [an] intermediary”
• where conflicting statements result in a “factual dispute regarding the relevance of the discovery sought,” it is inappropriate to deny discovery

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).