Skip to main content
· 5/8/1967

United States ex rel. Harbaugh v. Pennsylvania

Citations

  • 267 F. Supp. 948
  • 1967 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8359

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding trial courts have “broad discretion to 10 limit and tailor discovery to avoid abuse and overuse”
  • discussing the 2015 amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
  • discussing the 2015 amendments to the Federal 24 Rules of Civil Procedure
  • discussing the 2015 amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
  • “A change in the legal culture that embraces the leave no stone unturned and scorched earth approach to discovery is long overdue.”
  • “The pretrial process must provide 12 parties with efficient access to what is needed to prove a claim or defense, but eliminate 13 unnecessary or wasteful discovery”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Marsh

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.