United States Ex Rel. Grubbs v. Kanneganti

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, at least in the FCA context, a complaint can potentially survive even without alleging details on an actually submitted false claim
• recognizing that some claims simply require less factual detail to state a claim upon which courts may grant relief
• recognizing that some claims simply require less factual detail to state a claim upon which courts may grant relief
• observing that stating the circumstances of fraud “does not necessarily and always mean stating the contents of the [claim]”
• stating that proof of a false claim against the government is the “sine qua non” of liability under the FCA
• holding that in a False Claims Act case, it is sufficient to allege “particular details of a scheme to submit false claims paired with reliable indicia that lead to a strong inference that claims were actually submitted”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).