United States ex rel. Greenwald Industrial Products Co. v. Barlows Commercial Construction Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that qualified immunity “has no application to a suit for declaratory or injunctive relief”
• reasoning that a claim of qualified immunity was premature at the motion to dismiss stage because its application depended upon a determination of all of the circumstances as they reasonably appeared at the time of the action, which had not yet been fully developed
• “. . . the doctrine of immunity . . . has no application to a suit for declaratory or injunctive relief”
• official immunity doctrine has no application to suits for injunctive relief, at least so long as they do not have the inhibitory effect of suits for money damages
• case not moot where plaintiffs or other class member might again seek admission to presidential appearances to exercise first amendment rights
• \An unasserted defense available at the time of response to an initial pleading may not be asserted when the initial pleading is amended.\ (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).