United States ex rel. Great Lakes Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Orr Construction Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Even if in the resolution of that dispute Honeywell was found to be due something less than its claim, the notice may still have been substantially accurate, for the statute does not require precision.”
• “The principal purpose of the Miller Act is the protection of persons supplying labor and materials to subcontractors on federal construction projects. To that end, the Supreme Court has held that the Miller Act should receive a liberal construction.”
• contents of notice sufficient if “substantially accurate”
• strictly enforcing statutory notice requirement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).