United States ex rel. Gomes v. New Jersey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, given the changes produced by the JRA and the date of the defendant's underlying offenses, the trial court erred in revoking his probation on the basis of absconding
• holding that, given the changes produced by the JRA and the date of the defendant’s underlying offenses, the trial court erred in revoking his probation on the basis of absconding
• noting that the JRA controls probation \violations occurring on or after 1 December 2011\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).