United States ex rel. Gogoyewicz v. Flynn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying applicant's motion of intervention as of right where the only \disagreement [was] minor ... [and] reflect[ed] only a difference in strategy\
• finding legislative history useful to interpret ambiguous statutes, but declining to give effect to legislative history that contradicts or does not directly address the text of the statute
• “[A] statute must be interpreted to give significance to all of its parts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).