· 7/27/2000
United States Ex Rel. Giles v. Sardie
Citations
- 191 F. Supp. 2d 1117
- 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21068
- 2000 WL 33597142
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “It is improper for a moving party to introduce new facts or different legal arguments in the reply brief than those presented in the moving papers.”
- “It is improper for a moving party to introduce 28 1 Accommodations, The Rutter Group 2015, § 12:3 [in absence of published cases setting 2 forth these elements, looking to CACI Instruction for articulation of elements].
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Baird
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.