United States ex rel. Furst v. Curran

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that when a state’s constitution provides a “straightforward takings clause,” even when no case provides compensation for the precise kind of taking alleged by the plaintiff, the plaintiff “is still required to look to the state for (continued...
• directing the district court to determine whether, “prior to the issuance of the zoning permits, the discretion to issue them was so limited that a property interest existed in the[] permits” (emphasis added)
• \The inverse condemnation requirement of Williamson applies whenever compensation is sought for land that is taken. . . .\
• “The inverse condemnation requirement of Williamson applies whenever compensation is sought for land that is taken.... ”
• \The inverse condemnation requirement of Williamson applies whenever compensation is sought for land that is taken....\
• “In order to establish a protected property interest in [the] permits, [the plaintiff] will have to establish a lack of discretion on the part of officials to deny their issuance.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).