United States ex rel. Foote v. Johnson County

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Legislature intended for Uniform Rules of Evidence to apply to all cases — including criminal cases — despite their placement in a subtitle titled “Civil Procedure.”
• stating that newly discovered evidence was merely cumulative and impeaching without further discussion
• determining, sua sponte, that the Uniform Rules of Evidence, rather than the Federal Rules of Evidence, applied to the underlying case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).