United States ex rel. Farrell v. Haws

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The use of a ‘dangerously inaccurate’ test would not be a reasonable and necessary procedure[.]”
• “Contrary to Relators’ assertion, this doctrine applies to conspiracy claims outside of antitrust, where it was originally developed, and has in fact been applied by several federal courts to claims under the FCA.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).