United States Ex Rel. Dunn v. North Memorial Health Care

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that we may agree with the district court “on any basis supported by the record” (citation omitted)
• stating that a plaintiff may not “rely on the broad allegation that every claim submitted . . . is false in order to satisfy the particularity requirement”
• “Dunn may not simply rely on the generalized conclusion that North Memorial engaged in noncompliant conduct, and in doing so, caused thousands of instances of fraudulent billing.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).