Skip to main content
· 3/18/1966

United States ex rel. Duchin v. Follette

Citations

  • 251 F. Supp. 1006
  • 1966 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7912

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that expenses for photocopying, long- distance telephone calls, and postage are typically recoverable
  • recognizing that Toys R Us did not oppose the pending motions
  • awarding plaintiffs $5,000 each “consistent with the amount courts 10 typically award as incentive payments”
  • awarding plaintiffs $5,000 12 each “consistent with the amounts courts typically award as incentive payments”
  • awarding plaintiffs $5,000 each “consistent with the amount courts typically 16 award as incentive payments”
  • awarding plaintiffs $5,000 21 each “consistent with the amounts courts typically award as incentive payments”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Weinfeld

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.