Skip to main content
· 1/12/2011

United States Ex Rel. Davis v. Prince

Citations

  • 766 F. Supp. 2d 679
  • 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21706
  • 2011 WL 446869

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the sealing requirement applies when a relator \add[s] new claims for relief or new and substantially different allegations of fraud\
  • amended complaint merely “added specificity”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: T.S. Ellis III

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.