· 1/12/2011
United States Ex Rel. Davis v. Prince
Citations
- 766 F. Supp. 2d 679
- 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21706
- 2011 WL 446869
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the sealing requirement applies when a relator \add[s] new claims for relief or new and substantially different allegations of fraud\
- amended complaint merely “added specificity”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: T.S. Ellis III
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.