United States ex rel. Cumberbatch v. Shaughnessy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a party has standing to 5 challenge subpoenas issued to third parties which seek the party’s financial records
• holding that “Rule 45 subpoena served in conjunction with discovery must fall within the scope of proper discovery under FED.R.CIV.P. 26(b)(1).”
• finding a personal right “with respect to [the party’s] bank account records at the subpoenaed banks”
• finding defendant “has a personal right with respect to its bank account records at the subpoenaed banks, and this right gives it standing to move to quash the subpoenas”
• finding defendant “has a personal right with respect to its bank account records at the subpoenaed banks, and this right gives it standing to move to quash the subpoenas”
• considering a subpoena seeking operational checking account and payroll account information from a bank

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).