United States ex rel. Coltman v. Bullock

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the plaintiffs satisfied the adequacy prong and explaining that plaintiffs’ lack of understanding of some of the complexities of the case did not make them inadequate, especially when the plaintiffs are represented by zealous counsel
• \Courts are generally reluctant to deny class certification based on speculative problems with case management.\
• “Because the Provider Plaintiffs have demonstrated a common scheme or course of conduct, they also have shown typicality.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).