United States Ex Rel., Christopher Hall v. Teledyne Wah Chang Albany Teledyne Industries, Inc., Dba Teledyne Wah Chang Albany and Teledyne, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the federal government’s awareness of the FCA allegations meant that enforcement of an agreement did not impair the public interest in whistleblowing
• enforcing a release clause where the federal government had already investigated the allegations prior to the settlement
• “The government, of course, was not a party to the release, and is therefore not barred by it from pursuing a claim against Tele-dyne.”
• “The government, of course, was not a party to the release, and is therefore not barred by it from pursuing a claim against [the qui tam defendant].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).