United States Ex Rel. Champion Lumber Co. v. Fisher

Citations

• 227 U.S. 445
• 33 S. Ct. 329
• 57 L. Ed. 591
• 1913 U.S. LEXIS 2317

Syllabus

<p>Under subd. 5 of § 250 of the Judicial Code of 1911 a final judgment of the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia can only be reviewed by this court in cases where the validity of any authority exercised under the United States, or the existence or scope of any power or duty of any officer of the United States, is drawn in quéstion.</p> <p>The meaning of the phrase “drawn in question ” as it occurs in § 250 of the Judicial Code is the same as in § 709, Rev. Stat,; § 5 of the Circuit Court of Appeals Act, and other statutes regulating territorial appeals.</p> <p>A statute of the United States authorizing an officer to act in a certain manner under certain conditions is not drawn in question nor is the scope or validity of authority of the officer acting thereunder drawn in question, simply because there is a controversy as to whether the • specified conditions do or do not exist.</p> <p>Where the Secretary of the Interior refused to issue a patent because a protest was pending, the denial of a petition for a writ of mandamus directed to him to issue the patent on the ground that there was no protest, does not draw in question the validity or scope of his au~ thority but only the question of fact as to existence of a protest and there is no jurisdiction in this court under § 250 of the Judicial Code to review the judgment.</p>