Skip to main content
· 7/16/2010

United States Ex Rel. Carpenter v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.

Citations

  • 723 F. Supp. 2d 395
  • 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 71906
  • 2010 WL 2802686

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that whether a drug is recognized in the literature as effective for off-label use is a question more properly addressed at summary judgment
  • holding FERA § 4(f)(1) applies only to demands pending as of effective date
  • a “ ‘guesstimate’ derived from anecdotal experience” insufficient to state Rule 9(b) causation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ny

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.