United States ex rel. Camillo v. Ancilla Systems, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the HOD “was issued on November 28, 2006,” and that “[t]he plaintiff’s complaint in this action was filed with the Court on November 27, 2009, one day within the three-year statute of limitations period”
• “[T]o prevent Rule 12(e) from becoming a substitute for discovery, courts should generally deny a motion for a more definite statement where the information sought may be obtained in discovery.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).