United States ex rel. Braverman v. Curran

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming summary judgment for employer on interference claim and rejecting assertion that omissions in termination letter or investigation constituted pretext
• finding the undisputed record evidence concludes the investigation into plaintiff’s conduct was not a sham
• affirming summary judgment for employer on interference claim and rejecting assertion that omissions in termination letter or investigation constituted pretext
• finding the undisputed record evidence concludes the investigation into plaintiff’s conduct was not a sham
• “We will affirm a grant of summary judgment only if no reasonable jury would render a verdict for the non-moving party if the record at trial were identical to the record compiled in the summary judgment proceeding.” (quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).