United States ex rel. Berry v. Warden

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “participants in a defined contribution plan, such as the Plan here, [can] bring ERISA § 502(a)(2) claims 15 USCA4 Appeal: 24-1880 Doc: 70 Filed: 03/10/2026 Pg: 16 of 26 on their own behalf,” such that “putative class members have an individual remedy”
• finding 26 || allegations contained in the complaint sufficient to establish standing when ruling on a 27 || motion to certify the class
• denying certification of ERISA claims under federal rule 23(b)(1)(A) and (B) because plaintiffs sought primarily monetary damages

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).