United States ex rel. Berglund v. Boeing Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiffs’ allegations that they were recovering addicts and previously homeless was sufficient at the 12(b)(6) stage to support an inference that they were substantially limited in their ability to work and care for themselves
• stating that the “FHA does not abrogate states’ sovereign immunity under the Eleventh Amendment”
• “Recovering from substance abuse addiction . . . is also an impairment under section 504 of the RA, which defines ‘disability’ with reference to the ADA.”
• claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 barred by sovereign immunity of North Carolina which had not been waived
• claim under 42 U.S.C. 13 § 1983 barred by sovereign immunity of North Carolina
• claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 barred by sovereign immunity of North Carolina

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).