United States ex rel. Benaissa v. Trinity Health

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• distinguishing Navarette because 911 call placed from a gasoline station pay phone had no connection to caller
• distinguishing Navarette because the 911 call was placed from a gasoline station pay telephone with no connection to the caller
• “[C]onfirming a subject’s description, location, or other innocuous facts generally does not satisfy the corroboration requirement.”
• distinguishing Navarette and holding tip unreliable because 911 call was made on a pay phone and “officers were distinctly aware of the possibility” that defendant’s disgruntled acquaintance was the actual caller
• “[The Supreme Court’s] discussion of reliability [in Navarette] includes the observation that the Federal Communications Commission [(FCC

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).