United States Ex Rel. Automatic Elevator Co. v. Lori Construction

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• granting defendant’s dispositive motion where the plaintiff showed only that it performed work under a warranty clause, not work on the original contract, within one year of the date it filed its complaint
• granting defendant’s dispositive motion where the plaintiff showed only that it performed work under a warranty clause, not work on the original contract, within one year of the date it filed its complaint
• “It 21 therefore holds that [subcontractor’s] work in the performance of its warranty obligation did not 22 re-trigger the commencement of the [Miller] Act’s one-year limitations period.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).