United States Ex Rel. Alexander v. Dyncorp, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that FCA plaintiffs need to state facts from which the court can infer a knowing violation on the part of the defendants
• noting that FCA plaintiffs need to state facts from which the court can infer a knowing violation on the part of the defendants
• noting that FCA plaintiffs need to state facts from which the court can infer a knowing violation on the part of the defendants
• contractor misrepresented its record of business ethics
• applying government-action bar where allegations were “duplicative”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).