· 3/30/2004
United States Ex Rel. Adrian v. Regents of the University of California
Citations
- 363 F.3d 398
- 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 5838
- 2004 WL 503542
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “pleading review is not a game where the plaintiff is permitted to file serial amendments until he finally gets it right”
- noting that “pleading review is not a game where the plaintiff is permitted to file serial amendments until he finally gets it right”
- noting that “pleading review is not a game where the plaintiff is permitted to file serial amendments until he finally gets it right”
- noting that the Louisiana court had refused to allow a third amended complaint, stating that “pleading review is not a game where the plaintiff is permitted to file serial amendments until he finally gets it right”
- noting that the Louisiana court had refused to allow a third amended complaint, stating that “pleading review is not a game where the plaintiff is permitted to file serial amendments until he finally gets it right”
- noting that the Louisiana court had refused to allow a third amended complaint, stating that “pleading review is not a game where the plaintiff is permitted to file serial amendments until he finally gets it right”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Garza, Demoss, Clement
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.