Skip to main content
· 3/30/2004

United States Ex Rel. Adrian v. Regents of the University of California

Citations

  • 363 F.3d 398
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 5838
  • 2004 WL 503542

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “pleading review is not a game where the plaintiff is permitted to file serial amendments until he finally gets it right”
  • noting that “pleading review is not a game where the plaintiff is permitted to file serial amendments until he finally gets it right”
  • noting that “pleading review is not a game where the plaintiff is permitted to file serial amendments until he finally gets it right”
  • noting that the Louisiana court had refused to allow a third amended complaint, stating that “pleading review is not a game where the plaintiff is permitted to file serial amendments until he finally gets it right”
  • noting that the Louisiana court had refused to allow a third amended complaint, stating that “pleading review is not a game where the plaintiff is permitted to file serial amendments until he finally gets it right”
  • noting that the Louisiana court had refused to allow a third amended complaint, stating that “pleading review is not a game where the plaintiff is permitted to file serial amendments until he finally gets it right”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garza, Demoss, Clement

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.