Skip to main content
· 6/8/1988

United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Calumet Photographic, Inc.

Citations

  • 687 F. Supp. 1249
  • 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5331
  • 47 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 42

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • speculating that plaintiff who failed to verify charge would have been barred from suing employer that received notice of charge while it was pending before the EEOC and participated in EEOC conciliation proceedings
  • reasoning that “[a] charge which is neither filed under oath or affirmation, nor subsequently amended to cure this defect, fails, it seems, to satisfy th[e] statutory mandate”
  • speculating that plaintiff who failed to verify charge would have been barred from suing employer that received notice of charge while it was pending before the EEOC and participated in EEOC conciliation proceedings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brian Barnett Duff

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.