United States Department of Labor v. Kast Metals Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that notice and comment “would foresee aeons of rulemaking proceedings when all the agency seeks to do is operate in a rational manner”
• noting that notice and comment “would foresee aeons of rulemaking proceedings when all the agency seeks to do is operate in a rational manner”
• deeming a rule non-substantive where the rule’s “substantive effect . . . is purely derivative” of preexisting statutes and regulations
• finding a rule non-substantive because its substantive effect was “purely derivative” of another statute and rules
• deeming a rule non-substantive where the rule’s “substantive effect . . . is purely derivative” of preexisting statutes and regulations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).