Skip to main content
· 6/28/2006

United States Department of Labor, and United Mine Workers of America, Intervenor/plaintiff-Appellee v. Wolf Run Mining Company, Incorporated

Citations

  • 452 F.3d 275
  • 65 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 362
  • 179 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3137
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 16192
  • 2006 WL 1755881

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that notice within 24 hours of the hearing provided fair opportunity to oppose preliminary injunction
  • concluding that the defendant \had a fair opportunity to oppose the injunction and that the district court did not abuse its discretion in electing to enter a preliminary injunction in lieu of a TRO\
  • noting that TROs and preliminary injunctions are distinguished from one another only by their duration
  • noting that a temporary restraining order is distinguishable from a preliminary injunction only in duration
  • noting equivalent standards for granting a temporary restraining order (“TRO”) and a preliminary injunction
  • comparing Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(a) with Fed . R. Civ. P. 65(b)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Niemeyer, Shedd, Duncan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.