· 6/28/2006
United States Department of Labor, and United Mine Workers of America, Intervenor/plaintiff-Appellee v. Wolf Run Mining Company, Incorporated
Citations
- 452 F.3d 275
- 65 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 362
- 179 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3137
- 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 16192
- 2006 WL 1755881
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that notice within 24 hours of the hearing provided fair opportunity to oppose preliminary injunction
- concluding that the defendant \had a fair opportunity to oppose the injunction and that the district court did not abuse its discretion in electing to enter a preliminary injunction in lieu of a TRO\
- noting that TROs and preliminary injunctions are distinguished from one another only by their duration
- noting that a temporary restraining order is distinguishable from a preliminary injunction only in duration
- noting equivalent standards for granting a temporary restraining order (“TRO”) and a preliminary injunction
- comparing Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(a) with Fed . R. Civ. P. 65(b)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Niemeyer, Shedd, Duncan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.