Skip to main content
· 5/6/1929

United States Daily Pub. Corp. v. Nichols

Citations

  • 32 F.2d 834
  • 59 App. D.C. 34
  • 1929 U.S. App. LEXIS 3886

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that Congress intended for complaints under the PSLRA to stand or fall based on the actual knowledge of the plaintiffs rather than information produced by the defendants after the action has been filed
  • noting that mandamus is an especially appropriate vehicle for review where the court is confronted with an issue of first impression

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Robb

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.