United States Cellular Corp. v. City of Wichita Falls

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a city ordinance’s use of “may require” allowed the city council discretion to make case-specific decisions
• noting that “ ‘generalized concerns’ about aesthetics or property values do not constitute substantial evidence.”; See also AT & T Wireless PCS, Inc. v. City Council of City of Virginia Beach, 155 F.3d 423, 430–31 (4th Cir. 1998

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).