United Slate, Tile and Composition Roofers, Damp and Waterproof Workers Association, Local 307 v. G & M Roofing and Sheet Metal Company, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the determination of a reasonable fee is to be conducted by the district court regardless of any contract between plaintiff and plaintiff's counsel”
• finding futility, rather than repudiation, where the employer never agreed that it was a signatory to the collective bargaining agreement
• applying Hensley v. Eckerhart formulation to attorney’s fees under § 216 of the FLSA
• “the determination of a reasonable fee is to be conducted by the district court regardless of any contract between plaintiff and plaintiff’s counsel”
• “the determination of a reasonable fee is to be conducted by the district court regardless of any contract between plaintiff and plaintiff’s counsel”
• “the determination of a reasonable fee is to be conducted by the district court regardless of any contract between plaintiff and plaintiff’s counsel”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).